Photo credit: Deirdre Saoirse Moen. Today's guest post is by Wolf Pascoe. Wolf is a playwright, poet, and physician. Visit his blog, Just Add Father. Every so often, I read a blog post about how to listen to criticism.
|Published (Last):||27 July 2015|
|PDF File Size:||7.39 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.1 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Critical Response Process instills ways of thinking, communicating and being that enhance all kinds of human interactions, from coaching to community dialogue, from artistic collaboration to family conversations. In use for over 25 years, Critical Response Process has been embraced by art makers, educators, scientists, and theater companies, dance departments, orchestras, laboratories, conservatories, museums, universities, corporations, and kindergartens.
Role 3: Facilitator Initiates each step, keeps the process on track, and works to help the artist and responders use the process to frame useful questions and responses.
Step 1. Step 2. Artist as Questioner The artist asks questions about the work. Step 3. Neutral Questions Responders ask neutral questions about the work, and the artist responds.
Questions are neutral when they do not have an opinion couched in them. This step is one of the most fundamental, challenging, and misunderstood steps of Critical Response Process. Step 4. Opinion Time Responders state opinions, given permission from the artist; the artist has the option to say no.
Thank you so much for conceiving Critical Response Process , and for communicating it to us with such care. In Critical Response Process: a method for getting useful feedback on anything you make, from dance to dessert, authors Liz Lerman and John Borstel give a detailed introduction to the Process.
Beginning with its three roles and describing its four core steps, the book offers guidance for facilitators, practical examples, and useful variations. With a focus on actual works in progress — a dance, a script, a lecture, visual art work, even a cake — your training will highlight participation, conversation, and the flexibilty of the Process. You will leave with a firm grasp of procedures and tools to apply in your professional and daily life.
Training programs are customized to suit the needs of our hosts and may last from two hours to four days. The Critical Response Process team has trained arts faculty, orchestra members, museum docents, acting companies, social science researchers, and nonprofit boards, as well as students and makers in almost every artistic discipline.
Sign up for email updates and prompts related to Critical Response Process. Critical Response Process. Through the supportive structure of its four core steps, Critical Response Process combines the power of questions with the focus and challenge of informed dialogue.
The Process offers makers an active role in the critique of their own work. It gives makers a way to rehearse the connections they seek when art meets it audience or a product meets its purpose. Offers a work-in-progress for review and feels prepared to question that work in a dialogue with other people.
Role 2: Responder. Role 3: Facilitator. Initiates each step, keeps the process on track, and works to help the artist and responders use the process to frame useful questions and responses.
Statements of Meaning. Artist as Questioner. The artist asks questions about the work. Neutral Questions. Responders ask neutral questions about the work, and the artist responds. Opinion Time.
Responders state opinions, given permission from the artist; the artist has the option to say no. Purchase the book. Critical Response Process deepens dialogue between makers and audiences and enhances learning between teachers and students. Book a workshop. The Process empowers artists and invests responders with real responsibility as audience members.
Invest in Critical Response Process. Critical Response Process Certification. We will never ever ever sell or share your name.
Critical Response Process
Teacher professional development workshops are transformative for teachers insofar as they allow for collaborative insights to be reached through inquiry, dialogue, and feedback in an environment that is supportive, inclusive and open. The Critical Response Process is a process for receiving constructive feedback in a supportive group in which participants are assigned specific roles. As Liz Lerman's website states:. Critical Response Process CRP is a feedback system based on the principle that the best possible outcome from a response session is for the maker to want to go back to work.
Liz Lerman's Critical Response Process